I gave up on it and went to other powder when the new powder was producing much more force and was slower compared to aged stuff. I don't try to remember if I even attempted common h4831 or not; I'm contemplating not.

They've got performed identically for me. Like Everybody else I rushed to have the more recent SC Edition but have now switched back again. Preferably you need about 100% loading density. When you have enough circumstance capability for that H4831(long) you are possibly improved off.

The obvious bring about is often a tough/ruff bore. No number of copper fouling lessening agents while in the powder will probably proper this.

Warning making use of SC or SSC designed loads with very long Slice, again off and do the job up. Use Harmless loading strategies.

IMR powders also preform nicely for me with a person notable exception. Many of the chrongraphing I've done with them indicates the velecity is consistant previously mentioned 32 levels but starts to differ when the temp begins to drop. The closer to zero I get the more they differ. I have found as much as 250 fps in a 10 shot string with my 243 and 223 in the Winter season time all over here. Haven't noticed this with several of the other powders.

I understand, rough times. H4831SC will certainly perform, I just did not like the case density when loaded lengthy. I don't don't forget powder cost off the very best of my head but I was launching a Berger 168gr VLD at 3,000fps which is where I normally goal for being. Within your case employing what you have got (and what I ought to have accomplished) I'd get started with the tip from the bearing surface of your bullet appropriate on h4831sc load data the shoulder/neck junction, and flirt with extending seating depths from there when you look for a velocity node.

Nampa, Idaho In my practical experience the one authentic variance would be that the shortcut meters greater by way of reloading tools. At the time It is really loaded theres no purposeful variance. I've heard that the shortcut could have a small little bit a lot quicker burn off fee but it seems insignificant.

You might either: 1) Continue and have the objects stated underneath mechanically faraway from your searching cart:

Any load data to assistance that? My initial believed is it isn't likely to burn every one of the way and velocities is going to be slow and everywhere. May very well be a pleasant fireworks Show!

locutus stated: I nevertheless have a fantastic stockpile of H450, the ball powder equal of 4831, which flows through my powder measures smoothly.

Validate YOUR AGE Particular states prohibit advertising and marketing or advertising of firearms, ammunition, and h4831sc load data relevant firearm factors to minors. We’d like to make certain that you’re eighteen decades of age or more mature right before permitting you to shop our internet site. Are you presently eighteen many years of age or older?

It has been a bit, but I did get some 4831 SC to try. Identified a node and shot some teams. I shot a h4831 vs h4831sc .six 5 shot group nowadays. It really is a little bit slower than H1000, but shoots great. Thanks for the advice, it's fantastic to are aware that I've acquired solutions when 1 or another powder is dried up.

I typically often obtain the sc Edition. Utilizing a powder measure it hangs up much less as a result of shorter kernels and I feel permits additional reliable metering so a lot less time you're taking trickling in the last bit of demand to help make pounds. So mainly the SC will save you moments

I found that my 7mag 160 partitions had been sub MOA with 4831sc with reduced to min costs. I’m talking 2700 (perhaps 2800) fps, it was a low 60s grain demand inside of a Norma situation. Not what I was looking for, but exact However.